Abstracts

Flashing Timer Results in Marked Improvement in Heart Rate Assessment During Simulated Newborn Resuscitation

Presented at the Neonatal Society 2014 Spring Meeting.

Janes R, Pereira A, Morris D, Sharkey D

Academic Child Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Background: Heart rate (HR) at birth is the most useful measure of the need for and effectiveness of resuscitation. Initial assessment, using a stethoscope as recommended by international guidelines (1), is incorrect in approximately 30% of cases (2). Recommendations suggest counting the heart beats for 6 seconds and multiplying by 10 as an estimate of HR. However, internal calculation of time varies significantly between observers. We hypothesised a standardised 6 second flasher would increase HR accuracy during simulated newborn resuscitation.

Methods: Newborn Life Support (NLS) qualified healthcare professionals undertook simulated newborn resuscitation with heart rates randomly selected at 50, 70, 90 and 110bpm. Using a randomised crossover design, participants were randomly allocated to either calculate the HR, with a stethoscope, using their own preferred method or using a 6 second flashing timer. Accuracy (within 10bpm) and assessment time were compared between methods using appropriate parametric and non-parametric analysis. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Nottingham School of Medicine ethics committee.

Results: 44 NLS trained participants performed 440 HR assessments. HR accuracy improved significantly from 65% with their own method to 86% with the flashing timer (P<0.0001). This resulted in the difference with HR assessment using own method of 16.2bpm (95% CI 13.7-18.7) compared with 10.7bpm (95% CI 8.2-13.2) when using the timer. HR assessment time decreased significantly from 22.6s by own method to 14.7s with the timer (P<0.0001). When categorising the HR into NLS categories (HR>100, 60-100 and <60bpm) participants were incorrect using their own method 31% of the time compared to 16% with the timer (P<0.0001). When resuscitating the baby for 5 cycles of the recommended algorithm only 4 (9%) participants did this without error using their own method compared to 23 (52%) using the timer.

Conclusion: Use of a simple visual 6 second timer significantly increases accuracy of HR assessment during newborn resuscitation simulations and reduces overall time of assessment. Integration of such a timer into the stethoscope head or resuscitaire could be a simple and inexpensive method to improve newborn resuscitation.

Corresponding author: Don.sharkey@nottingham.ac.uk

References
1. Perlman et al, Circulation 2010;122[s2]:S516 –S538.
2. Voogdt et al, Resuscitation 2010; 81(8):1000-03.

More to explorer

Summer Meeting 2026

24th & 25th June 2026 Hybrid event: Virtual meeting or in person at University of Newcastle Register Here Submit Abstract Submission deadline

Spring Meeting 2026

19th March 2026 Hybrid event: Both online and in-person meeting at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), London 9:00-17:45 Register

Autumn Meeting 2025

  The Neonatal Society AGM will take place on the same day during a break in the sessions.  Friday 21st November 2025

Search by category
Scroll to Top

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies.